- #E howard hunt confession fake full#
- #E howard hunt confession fake trial#
- #E howard hunt confession fake tv#
The Rockefeller Commission appears to be correct – we don’t really know where he was & John McAdams cannot change that.Everette Howard Hunt, Jr. If his children were with him all weekend there would have been no need to remind them of “the fact”.
#E howard hunt confession fake tv#
Hunt also admitted during the Liberty Lobby case in 1981 that he had to “remind” his three children(ages 14,13,10) that he was watching tv with them all weekend & that he could not have been in Dallas on Novemor anywhere else for that matter. That “it cannot be determined with certainty where Hunt & Sturgis were on the day of the assassination”. He could have used their testimony (and many others) if he had been allowed to serve as Lee Oswald’s defense attorney as Oswld’s mother had asked him to before the Warren Commission. He interviewed Tippit murder witnesses Aquiila Clemons & Warren Reynolds, RR workers Richard Dodd & James Simmons just to name a few who otherwise would have been ignored. Marita Lorenz) might be wrong but I don’t believe they are intentional lies. Mark Lane has done more to provide truth to the study of the JFK murder than most researchers.
Simpson found him liable for wrongful death, which impugns his innocence). (Perhaps as somewhat of an analogy, the civil suit against O.J.
#E howard hunt confession fake trial#
In other words, it was more likely than not, that Hunt could have been a conspirator OR was lying about his whereabouts on November 22, 1963.Īlthough the verdict did not establish that Hunt was not a conspirator, it was not a criminal trial in the first place. I also had to chuckle on that bit about Sturgis and others denying Marita Lorenz’ charges (what do we expect these nefarious characters to do, lol?).Īs for Actual Malice not being demonstrated by Hunt (or Absence of Malice), it is still significant because it means that on a balance of probabilities, in the eyes of the jury, the Liberty Lobby didn’t publish anything that they honestly felt was untrue.
This doesn’t stop you from later castigating Lane for omitting certain aspects of the Rockefeller Commission, but why didn’t Hunt’s lawyers come to his rescue if it proved he had convincing alibis? That’s not the defending attorney’s job. The primer at the beginning that explains the workings of trial lawyers could apply to even Vincent Bugliosi, and make him out to be equally impartial or dubious. Sorry but I don’t read every link posted in a thread, unless it appears near my comments or put to me like you have now.Īnd with respect, I don’t automatically read links to your website based on my prior experience, which tells me that your website is biased (I would rather read independent sources).
Jack Griffin on JFK: the truth about the first shot.To support independent journalism about secret government, click here.